Differences In The Reading Comprehension Ability Of Students In The PQ4R Learning Model For Indonesian Language Subjects

Puji Rahmawati, Hamdiah Susanti, Yulia Deodata Selestin, Amin Mustajab

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to determine students' reading comprehension skills before and after using the PQ4R learning model. This research was motivated by preliminary studies, which showed that students' reading comprehension skills are still low in conventional learning models. This is a quantitative research consisting of a one-group pretest-posttest research design. Data were obtained from 22 students of state elementary school 03 Sontas using a written test of 6 (six) questions. The research showed differences in students' reading comprehension skills before and after learning using the PQ4R model.

Keywords


reading comprehension skills, PQ4R learning model, indonesian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aini, Nur. “Penerapan Strategi PQ4R Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Intensif Siswa Kelas VIII MTs Muhammadiyah 1 Malang Tahun Pelajaran 2008/2009.” Jurnal Artikulasi 8, no. 2 (2013).

Boliti, Sukamong. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas IV SDN 1 Lumbi-Lumbia Melalui Metode Latihan Terbimbing.” Jurnal Kreatif Online 2, no. 2 (2013): 12.

Cain, Kate, and Jane Oakhill. “Profiles of Children with Specific Reading Comprehension Difficulties.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 4 (December 2006): 683–96.

https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610.

Castles, Anne, Kathleen Rastle, and Kate Nation. “Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 19, no. 1 (June 2018): 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.

Fagerland, Morten W., and Leiv Sandvik. “The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney Test under Scrutiny.” Statistics in Medicine 28, no. 10 (2009): 1487–97.

Godino, Juan D., Vicenç Font, Miguel R. Wilhelmi, and Orlando Lurduy. “Why Is the Learning of Elementary Arithmetic Concepts Difficult? Semiotic Tools for Understanding the Nature of Mathematical Objects.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 77, no. 2–3 (July 2011): 247–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9278-x.

Kisac, Ibrahim, and Yusuf Budak. “Metacognitive Strategies of the University Students with Respect to Their Perceived Self-Confidence Levels about Learning.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (February 2014): 3336–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.759.

Linayaningsih, Fitria. “Metode PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite,Review) Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.” Majalah Ilmiah Informatika 2, no. 2 (2011): 12.

Mateos, Mar, Elena Martín, Ruth Villalón, and María Luna. “Reading and Writing to Learn in Secondary Education: Online Processing Activity and Written Products in Summarizing and Synthesizing Tasks.” Reading and Writing 21, no. 7 (October 2008): 675–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9086-6.

Nasution, Nurul Hidayah. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PQ4R Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Materi Ekosistem.” Proceeding Of Biology Education 1, no. 1 (2017): 24–29.

Pramana, Kadek Agus Bayu, and I Wayan Lasmawan. “Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran PQ4R Kontekstual Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS dan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus I Gianyar.” Doctoral dissertation, Ganesha University of Education 4 (2014): 11.

Rahayu, Nindy, and Tiara Anggia Dewi. “Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Refiew) Tehadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Kelas X Semester Genap SMA Negeri 1 Punggur.” PROMOSI: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi 5, no. 2 (2017).

Rahayu, Risma Amalia, Arie Rakhmat Riyadi, and Tatat Hartati. “Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Dengan Metode PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review) Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas Tinggi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 3, no. 2 (2018): 46–56.

Rikmasari, Rima, and Mega Lestari. “Metode Pembelajaran PQ4R Dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas V Di Bekasi.” JMIE (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education) 2, no. 2 (2018): 265–75.

Rozimela, Yenni. “The Students’ Genre Awareness And Their Reading Comprehension Of Different Text Types.” International Journal of Asian Social Science 4, no. 4 (2014): 460–69.

Sanacore, Joseph. “Transferring the PQ4R Study Procedure: Administrative Concerns.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 55, no. 5 (2010): 234–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1982.9958234.

Sarimanah, Eri. “Efeectivenes Of PQ4R Metacognitive Strategy Based Reading Learning Models in Junior High School.” Ijlecr-International Journal Of Language Education And Culture Review 2, no. 1 (2016): 74–81.

Sartika, Rody Putra, and Lukman Hadi. “The Improvement of Students’ Conceptual Understandings through the PQ4R Aided the 5E Learning Cycle Model on the Topic of Salts Hydrolysis.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1788, no. 1 (February 1, 2021): 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012036.

Sartika, Wila, and M. Syahrun Effendi. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, and Review) terhadap Kemampuan Menganalisis Unsur Naskah Drama Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau.” Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 5, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v5i2.9987.

Setiawati, Henny, and Aloysius Duran Corebima. “The Correlation Between Concept Gaining and Retention in PQ4R, TPS, and PQ4R-TPS Learning Strategies.” Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 4, no. 9 (2017).

Somadayo, Samsu. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PQRST Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Ditinjau Dari Minat Baca.” EDUKASI 13, no. 1 (2016).

St Y, Slamet. “Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Mahasiswa.” Paedagogia 12, no. 2 (2009): 118–29.

Tusfiana, Intan Ayu, and Dewi Tryanasari. “Kesulitan membaca pemahaman siswa SD.” Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Dasar 2 (2020): 8.

Wangka, Astriani, and Mustahidang Usman. “Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Dan Review) Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar PAI.” Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 1, no. 1 (2016): 68–76.

Whitman, Nathan R. “A Comparison of the Impacts of PQ4R and Mind Mapping.” Victoria Stewart, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 2015, 63.

Woolley, Gary. “Reading Comprehension.” In Reading Comprehension, by Gary Woolley, 15–34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7_2.

Yore, Larry, Gay L. Bisanz, and Brian M. Hand. “Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research.” International Journal of Science Education 25, no. 6 (June 2003): 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018.

Yuliana, Ira, and Noor Fajriah. “Penerapan Metode PQ4R dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII SMP.” EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 1, no. 1 (October 1, 2013). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v1i1.550.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v12i2.586

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://jurnal.albidayah.id/index.php/home/index

ISSN: 2549-3388 

Creative Commons License

This work for Jurnal Al Bidayah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Hosting & Design by www.groove.co.id